What is the function of the best evidence rule under Rule 1002?

• A. The original writing is required to prove its content, unless an exception applies.
• B. Paraphrase is enough.
• C. A summary is always sufficient.
• D. The evidence can be proven by any means.

Answer: (A)

The best evidence rule is about proving the exact content of a writing. It requires presenting the original document itself, not a paraphrase or description of it, so the court sees the precise words and terms used. This boosts reliability and prevents misinterpretation.

The correct idea is that the original writing is required to prove its content, unless a proper exception applies. If the original is lost, destroyed, or not obtainable with reasonable diligence, or if a party stipulates to a substitute, then secondary evidence may be allowed. This is why paraphrase or summary isn’t normally enough to prove the content—they are secondary evidence and come into play only under the listed exceptions. The rule doesn’t let you prove everything by any means; it anchors proof to the original unless an approved exception makes other evidence acceptable.